Sun Current http://current.mnsun.com Local News for Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield Minnesota Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:26 +0000 en-US hourly 1 How to Fix Social Security http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/how-to-fix-social-security/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/how-to-fix-social-security/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:26 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?guid=269ba49afa3e8568083bf62dcb1ea55c We often read reports from the Social Security Administration’s reviews of the status of its trust fund and predictions that in 20 years funding will exist to pay 77 cents on the dollar of promised benefits. So far this revelation produces from policymakers no actual steps to fix the system. What can we do to fix Social Security?

As future recipients of benefits, we can take some actions now to reduce reliance on our eventual benefits. This won’t fix the system’s underfunding problem but may help your own situation.

Push for pensions. As workers, we may enjoy more power than we realize to push our employers to consider offering pensions again. A cost tradeoff for the employer compared with costs of other benefits, a pension can still be an attractive tool for employee retention.

Hard but not impossible to implement, as Connecticut recently proved for the state’s municipal workers.

Increase other retirement savings. Maxing out your 401(k) contributions and choosing proper investment diversification are good ways to supplement a dwindling or reduced Social Security benefit. You can also contribute to a Roth individual retirement account (within limits) and make non-deductible contributions to your 401(k) of some significant amounts (I recently wrote about this).

What policy changes might fix Social Security? Congress can take plenty of actions, including the following few that while tough do stand to resolve Social Security’s underfunding more or less permanently.

Eliminate the earnings cap. Currently only a certain amount of your annual earnings incur Social Security tax: $118,500 in 2015, up from $117,000 this year. Earnings above that limit are not subject to the combined 12.4% (employer and employee) Social Security tax.

Eliminating this limit or cap might pump significant additional funds into the Social Security tax revenues annually. Right now this cap covers approximately 83% of all earnings – leaving up to 17% of all earnings untaxed.

Increase the tax rate. The Social Security tax rate noted above comprises 6.2% from your gross pay and 6.2% from your employer. Any increase in this rate improves the trust fund.

Means testing. Folks with significant other sources of retirement income can often get by very well with reduced benefits or even without benefits altogether. After all, this insurance program supposedly provides benefits to retirees who lack means to completely provide for themselves.

You, like many others, may find it frustrating that saving for yourself potentially puts you in a position to receive reduced benefits. To save all of Social Security, that’s the sort of tough decision we as a society must make.

Increase retirement age. In 1983, the retirement age for Social Security rose from 65 to 66 for folks born between 1943 and 1954, and to 67 for folks born in 1960 or later. It’s not out of the question to gradually increase this age another year, to 68 for folks born in 1966 or later.

At the other end of the spectrum, the early retirement age of 62 dates from when the Social Security program began. Changing this age might likely result in some positives for the trust fund – but leaving it the same also sometimes insidiously produces even smaller benefits for folks who file early.

Probably no steps to fix the system will be pleasant: It’s never easy to give up what you think you paid into and earned. Problem is, if we don’t work to repair Social Security we will all certainly give something up, starting with an estimated at 23% of all our benefits.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Jim Blankenship, CFP, EA, is an independent, fee-only financial planner at Blankenship Financial Planning in New Berlin, Ill. He is the author of An IRA Owner’s Manual and A Social Security Owner’s Manual. His blog is Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row, where he writes regularly about taxes, retirement savings and Social Security.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
We often read reports from the Social Security Administration’s reviews of the status of its trust fund and predictions that in 20 years funding will exist to pay 77 cents on the dollar of promised benefits. So far this revelation produces from policymakers no actual steps to fix the system. What can we do to fix Social Security?

As future recipients of benefits, we can take some actions now to reduce reliance on our eventual benefits. This won’t fix the system’s underfunding problem but may help your own situation.

Push for pensions. As workers, we may enjoy more power than we realize to push our employers to consider offering pensions again. A cost tradeoff for the employer compared with costs of other benefits, a pension can still be an attractive tool for employee retention.

Hard but not impossible to implement, as Connecticut recently proved for the state’s municipal workers.

Increase other retirement savings. Maxing out your 401(k) contributions and choosing proper investment diversification are good ways to supplement a dwindling or reduced Social Security benefit. You can also contribute to a Roth individual retirement account (within limits) and make non-deductible contributions to your 401(k) of some significant amounts (I recently wrote about this).

What policy changes might fix Social Security? Congress can take plenty of actions, including the following few that while tough do stand to resolve Social Security’s underfunding more or less permanently.

Eliminate the earnings cap. Currently only a certain amount of your annual earnings incur Social Security tax: $118,500 in 2015, up from $117,000 this year. Earnings above that limit are not subject to the combined 12.4% (employer and employee) Social Security tax.

Eliminating this limit or cap might pump significant additional funds into the Social Security tax revenues annually. Right now this cap covers approximately 83% of all earnings – leaving up to 17% of all earnings untaxed.

Increase the tax rate. The Social Security tax rate noted above comprises 6.2% from your gross pay and 6.2% from your employer. Any increase in this rate improves the trust fund.

Means testing. Folks with significant other sources of retirement income can often get by very well with reduced benefits or even without benefits altogether. After all, this insurance program supposedly provides benefits to retirees who lack means to completely provide for themselves.

You, like many others, may find it frustrating that saving for yourself potentially puts you in a position to receive reduced benefits. To save all of Social Security, that’s the sort of tough decision we as a society must make.

Increase retirement age. In 1983, the retirement age for Social Security rose from 65 to 66 for folks born between 1943 and 1954, and to 67 for folks born in 1960 or later. It’s not out of the question to gradually increase this age another year, to 68 for folks born in 1966 or later.

At the other end of the spectrum, the early retirement age of 62 dates from when the Social Security program began. Changing this age might likely result in some positives for the trust fund – but leaving it the same also sometimes insidiously produces even smaller benefits for folks who file early.

Probably no steps to fix the system will be pleasant: It’s never easy to give up what you think you paid into and earned. Problem is, if we don’t work to repair Social Security we will all certainly give something up, starting with an estimated at 23% of all our benefits.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Jim Blankenship, CFP, EA, is an independent, fee-only financial planner at Blankenship Financial Planning in New Berlin, Ill. He is the author of An IRA Owner’s Manual and A Social Security Owner’s Manual. His blog is Getting Your Financial Ducks In A Row, where he writes regularly about taxes, retirement savings and Social Security.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/how-to-fix-social-security/feed/ 0
Is Your Price Right? http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/is-your-price-right/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/is-your-price-right/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:24 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?guid=50884af6a83f937815b059590adcac7a How long has it been since you evaluated your pricing strategy? If you feel your business is not as profitable as it should be, do a pricing test. It takes some courage, but you might be pleasantly surprised by the outcome.

One of my earliest mentoring clients had a very nice business, but the company just wasn’t making enough money. We spent time looking at the industry and found that my client underpriced his products by about 20%.

All we did was change the pricing policy, and this change alone more than doubled his profits. The company went from being barely profitable to having enough cash to grow. 

However, even if you survey prices of your competitors, you might still not know whether your prices are correct. Your entire industry might be underpriced without knowing it.

There is no rule that says your prices have to be the same as others’. If you provide better products and service than your rivals, you deserve to charge more. Apple is a great example of this. Even though the prices of Apple’s products are significantly higher than those of its competitors, it has no problem getting people to pay extra.

The only way to find out if your pricing is correct is to test it. Value is always in the eyes of the beholder. This means your clients are the ones who tell you whether your service and products are worth the money you charge.

If you don’t have customers saying you’re too expensive, your prices are too low. If you have customers telling you that they can’t believe how much value you deliver, it’s time for you to think about raising your prices. It’s really that simple.

You might be concerned that increasing prices hurts sales. The solution to that is to find ways to add perceived value for your customers. When you work on improving your company’s profitability, I want you to focus on how you can continually increase the value you provide. The more valuable you make your service, the more people will be willing to pay for it.

The value you add should meet the needs of your customers. If you find you have a hard time getting people to say yes, maybe you provide more than they are willing and able to pay for. Make your offering less comprehensive and lower your prices. This helps the bottom line.

Do yourself a favor. Make sure you test your pricing, survey your customers, and better yet, have them pay you more by delivering additional value.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Josh Patrick is a founding principal of Stage 2 Planning Partners in South Burlington, Vt. He contributes to the NY Times You’re the Boss blog and works with owners of privately held businesses helping them create business and personal value. You can learn more about his Objective Review process at his website.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
How long has it been since you evaluated your pricing strategy? If you feel your business is not as profitable as it should be, do a pricing test. It takes some courage, but you might be pleasantly surprised by the outcome.

One of my earliest mentoring clients had a very nice business, but the company just wasn’t making enough money. We spent time looking at the industry and found that my client underpriced his products by about 20%.

All we did was change the pricing policy, and this change alone more than doubled his profits. The company went from being barely profitable to having enough cash to grow. 

However, even if you survey prices of your competitors, you might still not know whether your prices are correct. Your entire industry might be underpriced without knowing it.

There is no rule that says your prices have to be the same as others’. If you provide better products and service than your rivals, you deserve to charge more. Apple is a great example of this. Even though the prices of Apple’s products are significantly higher than those of its competitors, it has no problem getting people to pay extra.

The only way to find out if your pricing is correct is to test it. Value is always in the eyes of the beholder. This means your clients are the ones who tell you whether your service and products are worth the money you charge.

If you don’t have customers saying you’re too expensive, your prices are too low. If you have customers telling you that they can’t believe how much value you deliver, it’s time for you to think about raising your prices. It’s really that simple.

You might be concerned that increasing prices hurts sales. The solution to that is to find ways to add perceived value for your customers. When you work on improving your company’s profitability, I want you to focus on how you can continually increase the value you provide. The more valuable you make your service, the more people will be willing to pay for it.

The value you add should meet the needs of your customers. If you find you have a hard time getting people to say yes, maybe you provide more than they are willing and able to pay for. Make your offering less comprehensive and lower your prices. This helps the bottom line.

Do yourself a favor. Make sure you test your pricing, survey your customers, and better yet, have them pay you more by delivering additional value.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Josh Patrick is a founding principal of Stage 2 Planning Partners in South Burlington, Vt. He contributes to the NY Times You’re the Boss blog and works with owners of privately held businesses helping them create business and personal value. You can learn more about his Objective Review process at his website.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/is-your-price-right/feed/ 0
Plan to Prevent Bad $$ Moves http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/plan-to-prevent-bad-moves/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/plan-to-prevent-bad-moves/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:17 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?guid=db8b47c7c7ed5f08088f2d4d54965247 When managing personal finances and investments, people frequently exhibit irrational behavior for different reasons. If you’re one of these folks, be fair to yourself: It doesn’t even take a spate of market zigzags like October’s to prod you into questionable decisions.

Everyone makes choices about money nearly every day – how to earn, spend, save, invest and so on. Sometimes you pick wisely, sometimes harmfully. Some decisions, particularly those regarding when and where to invest, whipsaw from wise to harmful and back, depending on when you reached your conclusion and when you took the plunge.

Supposedly, if you can learn more about the cause and effect of your money decisions, and what around you contributes to them, you will improve your financial security. Pinpointing behaviors as either rational or irrational in the middle of the storm comes hard, though. The October market provided a convenient and timely case study to help explain why.

That month, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of large U.S. stocks declined 5.6% through Oct. 15 and then gained 8% through the end of the month. If sensitive to market moves, maybe you read the swift early declines and sold big – a flight perhaps revealed as irrational, given the late-October rally that continued into November.

If you sold in mid-October, you likely showed loss aversion – one of many often-irrational money behaviors. Psychologically, people perceive losses (or declines in value of an investment) as much as 2½ times more impactful than gains of a similar size. Watch your investment drop $1,000 and you feel more than twice as bad as you might feel good about a gain of $1,000.

Most people are loss averse; it’s clear why many sell when market prices decline. Is loss aversion irrational? Or sometimes, is it timely clairvoyance?

Rewind to 2007, when from Oct. 9-19 the S&P 500 quickly declined more than 4% – similar to what it  it did in early October this year. Let’s say you were one who sold  Oct. 15 this year (and looked irrational in hindsight). Let’s imagine further that in early October 2007 you also cut back your market exposure under these similar conditions.

Instead of irrational, you would have appeared brilliant. Oct. 9, 2007, was a high point; financial apocalypse reigned for the next year and a half.

What-if situations such as these clearly show that sometimes irrational behavior produces good outcomes. And sometimes well-trained (and often self-proclaimed) experts, applying rational processes to money management, wind up on the wrong side of the intended outcome, especially in the short term. This helps make investing fascinating and, at times, maddening.

Because investment markets are complex and potentially both irrational and efficient, understand well your tolerance for risk. Define what risk actually means in terms of your financial security, and your willpower to handle markets when fear and greed influence decisions.

A written investment strategy can serve as a foundation for your long-term decisions. Your strategy – and your commitment – may also benefit from testing your strategy’s performance hypothetically in past crises.

Since we can’t predict outcomes that depend partially on luck, we plan according to probabilities. For example, rather than focus on the size of your expected returns, know the probability that your investment strategy can support your desired spending rate in retirement or make tuition payments, fund a wedding, cover health-care costs and so on. Your broader financial plan drives your investment strategy, not the other way around.

Ideally, when your goals link directly to your plan, you have a better foundation for dealing with investment uncertainty and Wall Street’s effect on your emotions and decisions.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Gary Brooks is a certified financial planner and the president of Brooks, Hughes & Jones, and a registered investment adviser in Tacoma, Wash. An expanded version of this piece first ran at his blog The Money Architects.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

]]>
When managing personal finances and investments, people frequently exhibit irrational behavior for different reasons. If you’re one of these folks, be fair to yourself: It doesn’t even take a spate of market zigzags like October’s to prod you into questionable decisions.

Everyone makes choices about money nearly every day – how to earn, spend, save, invest and so on. Sometimes you pick wisely, sometimes harmfully. Some decisions, particularly those regarding when and where to invest, whipsaw from wise to harmful and back, depending on when you reached your conclusion and when you took the plunge.

Supposedly, if you can learn more about the cause and effect of your money decisions, and what around you contributes to them, you will improve your financial security. Pinpointing behaviors as either rational or irrational in the middle of the storm comes hard, though. The October market provided a convenient and timely case study to help explain why.

That month, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of large U.S. stocks declined 5.6% through Oct. 15 and then gained 8% through the end of the month. If sensitive to market moves, maybe you read the swift early declines and sold big – a flight perhaps revealed as irrational, given the late-October rally that continued into November.

If you sold in mid-October, you likely showed loss aversion – one of many often-irrational money behaviors. Psychologically, people perceive losses (or declines in value of an investment) as much as 2½ times more impactful than gains of a similar size. Watch your investment drop $1,000 and you feel more than twice as bad as you might feel good about a gain of $1,000.

Most people are loss averse; it’s clear why many sell when market prices decline. Is loss aversion irrational? Or sometimes, is it timely clairvoyance?

Rewind to 2007, when from Oct. 9-19 the S&P 500 quickly declined more than 4% – similar to what it  it did in early October this year. Let’s say you were one who sold  Oct. 15 this year (and looked irrational in hindsight). Let’s imagine further that in early October 2007 you also cut back your market exposure under these similar conditions.

Instead of irrational, you would have appeared brilliant. Oct. 9, 2007, was a high point; financial apocalypse reigned for the next year and a half.

What-if situations such as these clearly show that sometimes irrational behavior produces good outcomes. And sometimes well-trained (and often self-proclaimed) experts, applying rational processes to money management, wind up on the wrong side of the intended outcome, especially in the short term. This helps make investing fascinating and, at times, maddening.

Because investment markets are complex and potentially both irrational and efficient, understand well your tolerance for risk. Define what risk actually means in terms of your financial security, and your willpower to handle markets when fear and greed influence decisions.

A written investment strategy can serve as a foundation for your long-term decisions. Your strategy – and your commitment – may also benefit from testing your strategy’s performance hypothetically in past crises.

Since we can’t predict outcomes that depend partially on luck, we plan according to probabilities. For example, rather than focus on the size of your expected returns, know the probability that your investment strategy can support your desired spending rate in retirement or make tuition payments, fund a wedding, cover health-care costs and so on. Your broader financial plan drives your investment strategy, not the other way around.

Ideally, when your goals link directly to your plan, you have a better foundation for dealing with investment uncertainty and Wall Street’s effect on your emotions and decisions.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Gary Brooks is a certified financial planner and the president of Brooks, Hughes & Jones, and a registered investment adviser in Tacoma, Wash. An expanded version of this piece first ran at his blog The Money Architects.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/plan-to-prevent-bad-moves/feed/ 0
Money Smarts: How U.S. Rates http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/money-smarts-how-u-s-rates/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/money-smarts-how-u-s-rates/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:13 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?guid=b21c2ed9629aff303f0c36200921ef47 We all flip between believing that America leads the world at everything to thinking our nation lags behind foreign powerhouses in every way. Regarding financial literacy, we’re solid in the top five – but far from best.

The recent Visa International Financial Literacy Barometer reports that the U.S. ranks fourth out of 28 countries. If you think sophisticated Europeans edge us out, you’re wrong. The top five nations were Brazil, Mexico, Australia, the U.S. and Canada.

The first question surveyed the 25,500 respondents worldwide about the age at which children need to learn financial literacy. The U.S. came in at around the global average of 11.3 years old. Respondents in Brazil, overall the most financially literate nation in the world, said children need to start becoming financially literate at age 9.

The answers to four subsequent questions helped determined the rankings:

1. Do you have and follow a household budget? The best budgeters were in Brazil, Japan, Australia, South Africa and Canada. The U.S. placed sixth.

2. How many months’ worth of savings do you have aside for an emergency? The best savers were in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan and Canada. The U.S. placed seventh.

Overall, more than one in three (68%) of respondents had less than three months of emergency savings. A quarter of high-income respondents worldwide have less than three months of savings.

3. How often do you talk to your children (ages five to 17) about money management issues? Parents who talked most frequently about money with children were in Mexico, Brazil, Serbia, Bosnia and Lebanon. The U.S. again placed sixth.

Parents and other adults in the wealthier nations spent the least time talking to children about money.

4. To what extent would you say teenagers and young adults in your country understand money management basics and are adequately prepared to manage their own money? More adults in Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Colombia and Mexico believed kids understood financial basics than in other countries.

More than half the countries surveyed believe the young understand little about finances. America also gave its youngsters low marks here: The U.S. placed 27th.

It’s remarkable we placed fourth when our ranking was lower than that on every individual question. Our final ranking was higher partially because questions that America did better than other nations on happened to count for more toward the final score.

The best financial education begins at home. If interested in educating your children about money, you can try another Visa survey entitled “The Tooth Fairy Tightens Purse Strings.”

In 2014, the Tooth Fairy left American kids 8% less, on average, than in 2013. American children received about $3.40 per tooth.

Ask your children why that might be. Are kids losing more teeth so the Fairy must retrench and pay less? Did the Fairy budget badly? Are some teeth worth more than others (perhaps cavities versus cavity-free)?

The world’s a big place: What do you really learn when you hear that Indonesians talk to kids about money only 5.5 days a year? It’s always easier to learn when your own wallet is part of the subject.

 

Jonathan K. DeYoe, AIF and CPWA, is the founder and president of DeYoe Wealth Management in Berkeley, California, and blogs at the Happiness Dividend Blog. Financial planning and investment advisory services offered through DeYoe Wealth Management, Inc., a registered investment advisor.

 

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations to any individual. For your individual planning and investing needs, please see your investment professional.

Follow Jonathan K. DeYoe on Twitter at @happinessdiv.

 

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
We all flip between believing that America leads the world at everything to thinking our nation lags behind foreign powerhouses in every way. Regarding financial literacy, we’re solid in the top five – but far from best.

The recent Visa International Financial Literacy Barometer reports that the U.S. ranks fourth out of 28 countries. If you think sophisticated Europeans edge us out, you’re wrong. The top five nations were Brazil, Mexico, Australia, the U.S. and Canada.

The first question surveyed the 25,500 respondents worldwide about the age at which children need to learn financial literacy. The U.S. came in at around the global average of 11.3 years old. Respondents in Brazil, overall the most financially literate nation in the world, said children need to start becoming financially literate at age 9.

The answers to four subsequent questions helped determined the rankings:

1. Do you have and follow a household budget? The best budgeters were in Brazil, Japan, Australia, South Africa and Canada. The U.S. placed sixth.

2. How many months’ worth of savings do you have aside for an emergency? The best savers were in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan and Canada. The U.S. placed seventh.

Overall, more than one in three (68%) of respondents had less than three months of emergency savings. A quarter of high-income respondents worldwide have less than three months of savings.

3. How often do you talk to your children (ages five to 17) about money management issues? Parents who talked most frequently about money with children were in Mexico, Brazil, Serbia, Bosnia and Lebanon. The U.S. again placed sixth.

Parents and other adults in the wealthier nations spent the least time talking to children about money.

4. To what extent would you say teenagers and young adults in your country understand money management basics and are adequately prepared to manage their own money? More adults in Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Colombia and Mexico believed kids understood financial basics than in other countries.

More than half the countries surveyed believe the young understand little about finances. America also gave its youngsters low marks here: The U.S. placed 27th.

It’s remarkable we placed fourth when our ranking was lower than that on every individual question. Our final ranking was higher partially because questions that America did better than other nations on happened to count for more toward the final score.

The best financial education begins at home. If interested in educating your children about money, you can try another Visa survey entitled “The Tooth Fairy Tightens Purse Strings.”

In 2014, the Tooth Fairy left American kids 8% less, on average, than in 2013. American children received about $3.40 per tooth.

Ask your children why that might be. Are kids losing more teeth so the Fairy must retrench and pay less? Did the Fairy budget badly? Are some teeth worth more than others (perhaps cavities versus cavity-free)?

The world’s a big place: What do you really learn when you hear that Indonesians talk to kids about money only 5.5 days a year? It’s always easier to learn when your own wallet is part of the subject.

 

Jonathan K. DeYoe, AIF and CPWA, is the founder and president of DeYoe Wealth Management in Berkeley, California, and blogs at the Happiness Dividend Blog. Financial planning and investment advisory services offered through DeYoe Wealth Management, Inc., a registered investment advisor.

 

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations to any individual. For your individual planning and investing needs, please see your investment professional.

Follow Jonathan K. DeYoe on Twitter at @happinessdiv.

 

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/money-smarts-how-u-s-rates/feed/ 0
Knowing Needs from Wants http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/knowing-needs-from-wants/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/knowing-needs-from-wants/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:09 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?guid=76516101c63f3ac037ce0ffca76e9fa7 Making more money is not a necessary step to achieve your goals. If you truly wish to save more, you have to know how to identify a want in disguise of a need.

Sometimes, when you save for large goals in the future, such as retirement or a down payment on a home, you may feel that you need to make more money before these things can happen. You think that once your incomes are up to a certain level, you’ll be able to afford to save.

Not true. For many folks, learning to distinguish between wants and needs is enough to get you to your savings goals.

Here’s an exercise I do with my students in the class I teach whenever I hear them say that they “can’t afford” to save. Grabbing a marker, I ask them to tell me what monthly expenses they have and write those down on the board. For example, dining out: $100 per month; car payment: $250 per month; cable TV: $120; and smartphone: $80. Other items include clothes and shoes, getting hair and nails done and playing the lottery.

Then we look at the board and really think about whether these things are needs. This is where the fun begins. Initially, my students rationalize why they need the things they want. A big point of contention is smartphones. Many students say they need them, but in reality admit that smartphones aren’t something they can’t live without. And that’s the point to this exercise – rationalizing. We’re very good at rationalizing what we want, making it sounds like a need when it is not.

If the students can do without the things listed on the board, they can save $550. To hit the $5,500 annual max of contribution to an individual retirement account, they only need $458.33 per month. This means without having to ask for a raise or to get a second job, they can max out an IRA and still having $92 left over to invest.

With my trusty financial calculator, and using the students’ timeline for retirement, I come up with an amount that blows my students away. If they have 40 years to fund an IRA up to the limit until retirement, with a reasonable rate of return in the market of 7%, they can accumulate $1,174,853 in 40 years – all without having to make more money. This was money they are already spending.

For all of us, it boils down to priorities. Once we make our future financial needs a priority, we can change our perception of what we really need versus what we want, and reallocate our money accordingly to fund our goals.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Sterling Raskie, MSFS, CFP, is an independent, fee-only financial planner at Blankenship Financial Planning in New Berlin, IL. He is an adjunct professor teaching courses in math, finance, insurance and investments. His blog is Getting Your Financial Ducks in a Row, where he writes regularly about investments, retirement savings and financial planning.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

]]>
Making more money is not a necessary step to achieve your goals. If you truly wish to save more, you have to know how to identify a want in disguise of a need.

Sometimes, when you save for large goals in the future, such as retirement or a down payment on a home, you may feel that you need to make more money before these things can happen. You think that once your incomes are up to a certain level, you’ll be able to afford to save.

Not true. For many folks, learning to distinguish between wants and needs is enough to get you to your savings goals.

Here’s an exercise I do with my students in the class I teach whenever I hear them say that they “can’t afford” to save. Grabbing a marker, I ask them to tell me what monthly expenses they have and write those down on the board. For example, dining out: $100 per month; car payment: $250 per month; cable TV: $120; and smartphone: $80. Other items include clothes and shoes, getting hair and nails done and playing the lottery.

Then we look at the board and really think about whether these things are needs. This is where the fun begins. Initially, my students rationalize why they need the things they want. A big point of contention is smartphones. Many students say they need them, but in reality admit that smartphones aren’t something they can’t live without. And that’s the point to this exercise – rationalizing. We’re very good at rationalizing what we want, making it sounds like a need when it is not.

If the students can do without the things listed on the board, they can save $550. To hit the $5,500 annual max of contribution to an individual retirement account, they only need $458.33 per month. This means without having to ask for a raise or to get a second job, they can max out an IRA and still having $92 left over to invest.

With my trusty financial calculator, and using the students’ timeline for retirement, I come up with an amount that blows my students away. If they have 40 years to fund an IRA up to the limit until retirement, with a reasonable rate of return in the market of 7%, they can accumulate $1,174,853 in 40 years – all without having to make more money. This was money they are already spending.

For all of us, it boils down to priorities. Once we make our future financial needs a priority, we can change our perception of what we really need versus what we want, and reallocate our money accordingly to fund our goals.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Sterling Raskie, MSFS, CFP, is an independent, fee-only financial planner at Blankenship Financial Planning in New Berlin, IL. He is an adjunct professor teaching courses in math, finance, insurance and investments. His blog is Getting Your Financial Ducks in a Row, where he writes regularly about investments, retirement savings and financial planning.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/knowing-needs-from-wants/feed/ 0
Spotting a Tax-Scam Call http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/spotting-a-tax-scam-call/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/spotting-a-tax-scam-call/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:30:02 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?guid=04128bde898a64153f990f7d16282b20 Know who never seems to take a holiday? Scammers pretending to be the Internal Revenue Service. Don’t become the next victim; here’s what to know to protect yourself.

In these aggressive scams, callers claiming to be from the IRS may demand money, or may say you’re due a refund and try to trick you into sharing private information. Sometimes they already have bits of that information – such as the last four digits of your Social Security number – and usually alter the caller ID to try to make you believe they are in fact from the IRS.

Among other tactics, bogus emails sometimes follow the calls, and victims report hearing background noise that mimics that of a call site. Scammers often use bogus IRS identification badge numbers and of course fake names. If you don’t answer, they often leave an “urgent” callback request or phone you back with a new strategy.

Recently, taxpayers reported that scammers frequently target immigrants, potential victims threatened with deportation, arrest, shutting off utilities or revoking driver’s licenses. The IRS says that callers are frequently insulting or hostile, sometimes following up with calls pretending to be from the police or local department of motor vehicles, with the caller ID again supporting their claim.

Other unrelated scams, such as a lottery sweepstakes and phony solicitations for debt relief, also fraudulently claim to be from the IRS.

Here are five things scammers often do but the IRS never does. Any one is a telltale sign. The IRS never:

  1. Calls to demand immediate payment or call about taxes you owe without first mailing you a bill.
  2. Demands that you pay taxes without giving you the opportunity to question or appeal the amount the agency says you owe.
  3. Requires you to use a specific payment method for your taxes, such as a prepaid debit card.
  4. Asks for your credit card or debit card numbers over the phone.
  5. Threatens to involve your local police or other law-enforcement to arrest you for not paying taxes.

In addition, the IRS does not use unsolicited email, text messages or any social media to discuss your personal tax issue.

If you get a call from someone claiming to be from the IRS and asking for money, you can report the incident to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration at (800) 366-4484 or at the TIGTA complaint contact page.

If you get a call from someone claiming to be from the IRS and you believe you do owe taxes, call the IRS at (800) 829-1040. The employees there can help with a payment issue – if there really is such an issue.

If you receive an email you suspect comes from scammers, do not open any attachments or click on any links in the message but instead forward the email to phishing@irs.gov. A new IRS YouTube video also warns about scams.

And again remember: Give no personal information to strangers over the phone. The con artists are only impersonating the IRS and, unfortunately, can be very convincing.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Maureen Crimmins is the co-founder of Crimmins Wealth Management LLC in Woodcliff Lake, N.J. Her websites are www.CrimminsWM.com and www.RootsofWealth.com.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
Know who never seems to take a holiday? Scammers pretending to be the Internal Revenue Service. Don’t become the next victim; here’s what to know to protect yourself.

In these aggressive scams, callers claiming to be from the IRS may demand money, or may say you’re due a refund and try to trick you into sharing private information. Sometimes they already have bits of that information – such as the last four digits of your Social Security number – and usually alter the caller ID to try to make you believe they are in fact from the IRS.

Among other tactics, bogus emails sometimes follow the calls, and victims report hearing background noise that mimics that of a call site. Scammers often use bogus IRS identification badge numbers and of course fake names. If you don’t answer, they often leave an “urgent” callback request or phone you back with a new strategy.

Recently, taxpayers reported that scammers frequently target immigrants, potential victims threatened with deportation, arrest, shutting off utilities or revoking driver’s licenses. The IRS says that callers are frequently insulting or hostile, sometimes following up with calls pretending to be from the police or local department of motor vehicles, with the caller ID again supporting their claim.

Other unrelated scams, such as a lottery sweepstakes and phony solicitations for debt relief, also fraudulently claim to be from the IRS.

Here are five things scammers often do but the IRS never does. Any one is a telltale sign. The IRS never:

  1. Calls to demand immediate payment or call about taxes you owe without first mailing you a bill.
  2. Demands that you pay taxes without giving you the opportunity to question or appeal the amount the agency says you owe.
  3. Requires you to use a specific payment method for your taxes, such as a prepaid debit card.
  4. Asks for your credit card or debit card numbers over the phone.
  5. Threatens to involve your local police or other law-enforcement to arrest you for not paying taxes.

In addition, the IRS does not use unsolicited email, text messages or any social media to discuss your personal tax issue.

If you get a call from someone claiming to be from the IRS and asking for money, you can report the incident to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration at (800) 366-4484 or at the TIGTA complaint contact page.

If you get a call from someone claiming to be from the IRS and you believe you do owe taxes, call the IRS at (800) 829-1040. The employees there can help with a payment issue – if there really is such an issue.

If you receive an email you suspect comes from scammers, do not open any attachments or click on any links in the message but instead forward the email to phishing@irs.gov. A new IRS YouTube video also warns about scams.

And again remember: Give no personal information to strangers over the phone. The con artists are only impersonating the IRS and, unfortunately, can be very convincing.

Follow AdviceIQ on Twitter at @adviceiq.

Maureen Crimmins is the co-founder of Crimmins Wealth Management LLC in Woodcliff Lake, N.J. Her websites are www.CrimminsWM.com and www.RootsofWealth.com.

AdviceIQ delivers quality personal finance articles by both financial advisors and AdviceIQ editors. It ranks advisors in your area by specialty, including small businesses, doctors and clients of modest means, for example. Those with the biggest number of clients in a given specialty rank the highest. AdviceIQ also vets ranked advisors so only those with pristine regulatory histories can participate. AdviceIQ was launched Jan. 9, 2012, by veteran Wall Street executives, editors and technologists. Right now, investors may see many advisor rankings, although in some areas only a few are ranked. Check back often as thousands of advisors are undergoing AdviceIQ screening. New advisors appear in rankings daily.

 

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/spotting-a-tax-scam-call/feed/ 0
Santa Claus to visit Southtown Saturday http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/santa-claus-to-visit-southtown-saturday/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/santa-claus-to-visit-southtown-saturday/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:58:56 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?p=141292 Santa Claus will visit Southtown Shopping Center in Bloomington this weekend.

Pictures with Santa, as well as other activities – such as facepainting, music and interactive holiday crafts and activities provided by the Bloomington Theatre and Art Center – are planned 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturday, Dec. 20, inside the mall, 7801 Penn Ave.

A photographer will be available to take pictures of children with Santa.  One photo is free with a coupon available on Southtown’s website, southtownbloomington.com.

The shopping center features winter scenes painted on its windows by Bloomington artist Sarah Trembley.

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/santa-claus-to-visit-southtown-saturday/feed/ 0
Column: For many, e-cigs are an elegant solution http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/column-for-many-e-cigs-are-an-elegant-solution/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/column-for-many-e-cigs-are-an-elegant-solution/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:40:47 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?p=141280 by John McClay

guest columnist

During the last few years, electronic cigarettes have quietly become the most effective smoking cessation method available.

As e-cig use – “vaping” – has increased, smoking prevalence has decreased nationally from 21 percent in 2005 to 17.8 percent in recent years, which translates into millions of former smokers. This is the fastest decrease in smoking rates we’ve ever seen, both for youngsters and adults.

But wait, e-cigs cannot be marketed for smoking cessation because tobacco corporations lobbied the FDA to regulate e-cigs in 2009 as a “tobacco product.” If e-cigs were known by any other name – vaporizers, atomizers or inhaler – perhaps municipal officials would not conflate vaping and smoking. The Bloomington City Council recently overreached by prohibiting vapers from sampling in vape stores, thus “protecting” vapers from vapor.

The vast majority of vapers are adult former smokers, and most e-cig stores discourage non-smokers from trying e-cigs on site, now moot in Bloomington. Naturally, some adolescents experiment with vaping, because they’ll try anything that feels “cool.” But few will graduate to smoking – why spend 10 times more for a demonstrably more harmful, detectable and socially unacceptable product?

I am only one of the millions who have stopped smoking (a pack-a-day for 55 years) thanks to e-cigs. I started as a teen because it was cool, but as the research came in, I tried to quit many times – cold turkey, gum, lozenges and Zyban. All my efforts failed, and until last year I’d resigned myself to continue smoking until my last breath.

But since May 2013, resignation has turned to relief. I quit smoking and have zero desire ever to smoke again. Both my lungs (no congestion) and nicotine receptors are happy. E-cigs are not for everyone, but for many they are an elegant solution. I loved to smoke, and e-cigs work because they mimic the smoking experience, holding them, inhaling and watching the exhaled vapor, which looks like smoke.

Ah, there’s the rub, vaping looks like smoking. But things are not always as they appear.

First, e-cigs have no combustion, no smelly smoke, no tobacco and no carcinogenic tar. The exhaled water vapor is harmless to bystanders, according to studies thus far. Second, tobacco cigarettes contain at least 4,000 ingredients, some carcinogenic, added over the decades to enhance taste and increase addictiveness. By contrast, e-cigs contain just four ingredients — vegetable glycerin, propylene glycol, nicotine (which is flavorless) and flavoring.

But what about nicotine, in and of itself? It is a mild stimulant and, like caffeine, powerfully addictive, but not especially harmful and not carcinogenic. It has a temporary, mild constricting effect on blood vessels, which may raise blood pressure slightly. But if nicotine per se were harmful, it would not be available over the counter in gum or lozenge forms.

So in this big, messy, complicated world, we do what we can. This issue is about harm reduction – like seat belts, air bags, condoms and vaccinations. There are degrees of harm, and sometimes the best we can do is to take what we know, trust the unbiased research, weigh the costs and benefits, then massage the odds in a healthy direction, until something better comes along. Vaping is a significantly less harmful alternative to smoking.

Recalling the old days when ashtrays were ubiquitous and nonsmokers had to tolerate stinky tobacco smoke almost everywhere indoors, I applaud the Clean Indoor Air Act. But sending vapers outdoors, as if they were smokers, may turn out to be overkill.

Even if e-cigs are overly restricted by alarmist, but well-meaning, city or state officials who lump them together with tobacco cigarettes, they will continue to play their unadvertised but leading role in reducing the known harm of smoking.

McClay, of Bloomington, is a retired psychologist and professor.

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/column-for-many-e-cigs-are-an-elegant-solution/feed/ 0
Eden Prairie School Board approves $42 million tax levy http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/eden-prairie-school-board-approves-42-million-tax-levy/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/eden-prairie-school-board-approves-42-million-tax-levy/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:28:59 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?p=141180 BY SUE WEBBER – CONTRIBUTING WRITER

District agrees to partner with city on Safe Routes to School grant application

The Eden Prairie School Board on Dec. 9 approved a $42 million property tax levy for 2015, following its truth-in-taxation hearing.

According to Jason Mutzenberger, executive director of business services, each school district is required to provide during an annual tax hearing information on the current year’s budget and the proposed property tax levy, plus the percentage change over the prior year and reasons why the tax is increasing.

The bulk of the school district’s revenue comes from state aid, allocated on the basis of $5,831 per student enrolled, Mutzenberger said.

But since 2004-05, the state’s formula hasn’t kept pace with inflation, Mutzenberger said. In order to do that, he said, the per pupil allocation would have to be increased by $343, or 6.3 percent.

For 2015, the Legislature has approved an increase of 2 percent, or $105 per pupil. But 95 percent of the school districts in Minnesota still have to depend on referendum money to balance their budgets.

“Levy funding is a source that’s extremely important to us,” Mutzenberger said.

The total property tax levy for 2015 represents an increase of 8.1 percent. For the owners of a home valued at $325,000, the levy means an increase of $134 per year, or $11 per month for the school portion of their property taxes. Total school taxes for that home would be $1,490 in 2015.

“We are hopeful the Legislature may put more money into education,” Mutzenberger said.

Safe Route to Schools Grant
The Eden Prairie School Board also approved a resolution approving a joint application with the city of Eden Prairie for a grant to fund a tunnel near a pathway at Eden Prairie High School. A proposed underpass beneath the TC&W railroad tracks would connect Duck Lake Road with Eden Prairie High School.

The pathway under consideration now extends from the Prairie View area to the high school at 17185 Valley View Road, across railroad tracks and along a well-used path, officials said.

“This is something exciting for our two organizations to work on together,” said Robert Ellis, public works director for the city of Eden Prairie.

Ellis noted that the Legislature has allocated $1 million for Safe Routes to School (SRTS) grants on projects located within two miles of a school.

“This project fits that program to a T. It will be a way to get pedestrians from the west side of Duck Lake Road across the railroad tracks and tie into the trail in front of the dome,” Ellis said, adding that the current trail is used by large numbers of pedestrians – both community members and high school students – who are crossing the railroad tracks to access the high school.

Though no count has been taken of the number of people who access the trail each day, Ellis said, “It does get a lot of traffic. It’s a well-worn path, even in the snow.”
Sixty trains per day with an average of 100 cars per train travel that portion of the track at 30 miles per hour, Ellis said.

During the summer, the city met with representatives from the railroad, Ellis said. “Conversation quickly turned to this crossing and their desire to get rid of it, close it off,” he said. “It is a safety issue. There was a fatality there in the 1980s.”

He said the railroad would like to see the trail across the tracks closed, even though it would add one-fourth to one-third of a mile for pedestrians who go to Valley View to get to the high school.

Supt. Curt Tryggestad noted that the school district received a letter from the railroad 18 months ago “really urging us to find a way to keep kids away from there.”

“If we don’t find some way to improve it, they probably will do what they need to do to protect themselves,” Tryggestad said.
The joint application will request $500,000 for the project, Ellis said. The plan is to construct a pre-cast concrete structure with retaining walls, fencing, lights and wide trails.

The city will manage the project, beginning with the bidding, and pay all the costs up front, Ellis said. Because between $50,000 and $75,000 in design work is not included in the grant amount, he suggested that the city and the school district split that amount evenly.

The city would own, operate and maintain the structure. The school district would maintain sidewalks and be responsible for snow removal and light bulbs on the sidewalk extending from the underpass to school property.

Mutzenberger said funding for the school district’s portion of expenses would be taken from the capital fund, and another project would have to be postponed.
“We feel this is a high value item,” Mutzenberger said. “It’s of great importance for the safety of our kids.”

The grant application, which requires support from the city of Eden Prairie, will be on the Tuesday, Jan. 6 city council agenda, Ellis said. The application is due Friday, Jan. 9.
“If we are successful, we will find out in March,” said Ellis, who predicted the grant has “a better than 50-50 chance” of success. “There’s a lot of support behind it; there seems to be a lot of interest in it,” he said.

According to an earlier memo from the school district, the Minnesota Legislature in 2014 apportioned $1 million from the state general fund to the SRTS. The funds were intended to supplement aid for infrastructure projects under the federal SRTS program. The Minnesota Department of Transportation is responsible for the administration of the program and makes funds available to communities through a competitive process. Eligible projects must be within two miles of a school and should have a minimum construction cost of $100,000.

Sue Webber is a contributing writer for the Sun Current.

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/eden-prairie-school-board-approves-42-million-tax-levy/feed/ 0
Edina residents publish two new children’s books http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/edina-residents-publish-two-new-childrens-books/ http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/edina-residents-publish-two-new-childrens-books/#comments Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:52:28 +0000 http://current.mnsun.com/?p=141249 Edina resident Subhash Kommuru has published two new children’s books, illustrated by his wife Sujata Kommuru.

“Mother’s Love can Conquer Any Fear” has a positive message about bullying, teamwork and the power of a mother’s love in a tale featuring Shastriji, a wise old chicken, and Kaalia, a crow who is up to no good.

“The Magic of Friendship” is a lesson on mutual support and tolerance in a competitive culture where everything is a race, and excellence is the only acceptable destination. Set in the forest Tadoba during the Kojagiri festival, the book focuses on friendship and its healing effect.

Subhash and Sujata immigrated to the United States from India and wanted a way to tell stories with the diversity, traditional wisdom and cultural values that they remembered from their childhood. Their first book, “Bargad,” is available in English and Hindi.

]]>
http://current.mnsun.com/2014/12/edina-residents-publish-two-new-childrens-books/feed/ 0